<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Bing: Considered First Computer</title><link>http://www.bing.com:80/search?q=Considered+First+Computer</link><description>Search results</description><copyright>Copyright © 2026 Microsoft. All rights reserved. These XML results may not be used, reproduced or transmitted in any manner or for any purpose other than rendering Bing results within an RSS aggregator for your personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of these results requires express written permission from Microsoft Corporation. By accessing this web page or using these results in any manner whatsoever, you agree to be bound by the foregoing restrictions.</copyright><item><title>grammaticality - 'Considered' vs 'Considered as' - English Language ...</title><link>https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/83401/considered-vs-considered-as</link><description>The theory: Considered + object Used when the subject should be just another name for something. Literally, that the object is the subject. He should be considered our leader since he makes all the decisions. = He is our leader. Considered + as + object Used when the object can be used to replace the subject. Indoor soccer should be considered as an alternative to outdoor soccer in winter ...</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:27:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>word choice - "considered as" vs "considered to be" - English Language ...</title><link>https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/200650/considered-as-vs-considered-to-be</link><description>Both “considered to be” and “considered as” are incorrect. The words “as” or “to be”, when used after the word “considered” are nearly always superfluous, and therefore unnecessary. The sentence in your example above (without all of the ellipses, of course) is already structured correctly. Over the past several years, I have noticed both “considered to be” and ...</description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 16:44:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>grammar - is every letter considered a word? - English Language ...</title><link>https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/278164/is-every-letter-considered-a-word</link><description>There are no rules in English about the number of letters required to comprise a word. The letter I, when capitalised, is considered a word because it is sufficient to refer to the speaker. Given the impact of texting on the language, you may well find future authors writing: Y r u asking about I?</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:45:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>grammar - "to be considered " vs "should be considered" - English ...</title><link>https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/197688/to-be-considered-vs-should-be-considered</link><description>Consider the following sentence. We are happy to recommended that his son to be considered for the post. This is grammatically incorrect(why?). The notes I am reading says that the correct sent...</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 19:17:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>subjunctives - Is "considered" always followed by "as"? - English ...</title><link>https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/11226/is-considered-always-followed-by-as</link><description>I have the following idea: The reconstruction of object models is performed using a graph matching approach, which is considered a corner fixing dilemma. The reconstruction of object mode...</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:53:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>phrase meaning - is considered / is considered to be / is considered as ...</title><link>https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/294724/is-considered-is-considered-to-be-is-considered-as</link><description>Is considered as is an alternative way of saying the same thing. I don't see any problem with your example about French as a language of love, although it would more usually be phrased as the language of love.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:44:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>grammar - Is "considered" a linking verb? Considered + adj or ...</title><link>https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/244129/is-considered-a-linking-verb-considered-adj-or-considerably-adj</link><description>The "linking verb" here is IS, which forms / identifies the relationship between the solar panel and how it's rated / considered by pundits. The actual word considered (= thought to be) is completely optional here. All it really does is perhaps "downplay" the rating "innovative" to the status of mere opinion, rather than being an established fact.</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:38:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>grammar - It was the best ever vs it is the best ever? - English ...</title><link>https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/336995/it-was-the-best-ever-vs-it-is-the-best-ever</link><description>So, " Michael Jordan was the best player of all time " could mean that at he was once considered the best player of all time, but someone else has since surpassed him, or it could mean he is still the best of all time, just no longer active.</description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 16:10:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>vocabulary - Is "bullshit" still considered offensive when used in a ...</title><link>https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/355815/is-bullshit-still-considered-offensive-when-used-in-a-narrower-sense</link><description>The latter is considered to be far worse, so context is important, too. Most people would not use language that could be considered offensive by some in the workplace or in the company of people not well known to you, as you may not know how they personally feel about such words.</description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 14:35:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Are 'ass' and its derivations considered vulgar words?</title><link>https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/313309/are-ass-and-its-derivations-considered-vulgar-words</link><description>Using the word 'ass' to describe someone is considered vulgar in itself, but not severely so. Non-vulgar equivalents would be 'jerk', 'uncouth', etc. This is different from 'asshole', which usually is a mean and selfish person who does not mind causing offense or inconvenience to others. An asshole spreads conflict and misery wherever they go.</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:21:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>