<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Bing: Fonction Cryptage Python</title><link>http://www.bing.com:80/search?q=Fonction+Cryptage+Python</link><description>Search results</description><copyright>Copyright © 2026 Microsoft. All rights reserved. These XML results may not be used, reproduced or transmitted in any manner or for any purpose other than rendering Bing results within an RSS aggregator for your personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of these results requires express written permission from Microsoft Corporation. By accessing this web page or using these results in any manner whatsoever, you agree to be bound by the foregoing restrictions.</copyright><item><title>transatlantic differences - What's a word for a small rural property ...</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/639217/whats-a-word-for-a-small-rural-property-where-the-only-agriculture-is-small-sca</link><description>If by any chance any of you are Portuguese speakers, I am looking for a word that would be an equivalent to the Brazilian Portuguese term chácara. In this kind of rural property, no cattle are rais...</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:36:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>"Filter by" or "filter according to"? - English Language &amp; Usage Stack ...</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/431866/filter-by-or-filter-according-to</link><description>ie. Filtering a list of events by venue, or filtering a list of events according to the venue Thank you. EDIT: I always used by as in a direct translation from French filtrer par; according to would be dépendemment de ou en fonction de which also works, but which one is more "common", or correct in that situation eludes me in English.</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Are there examples of triple entendres in English?</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/623915/are-there-examples-of-triple-entendres-in-english</link><description>I don't know if triple entendres exist. I did a lot of online research, but I what I found were examples of double entendres. There were examples that claimed to be triple entendres, but they had one</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 15:18:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Does "multiple" mean simply "more than one" or is it better used to ...</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/572653/does-multiple-mean-simply-more-than-one-or-is-it-better-used-to-connote-divi</link><description>First, "more than one" and "many" are acceptable meanings for " multiple." 1 : consisting of, including, or involving more than one: multiple births, multiple choices 2 : MANY, MANIFOLD multiple achievements: He suffered multiple injuries in the accident. We could stop there, but we can do better. "Multiple," many authorities and kibitzers contend, is best used to describe separation ...</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 18:55:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>An appropriate term for the 'contamination' of a language</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/233187/an-appropriate-term-for-the-contamination-of-a-language</link><description>La principale fonction de l’Académie sera de travailler, avec tout le soin et toute la diligence possibles, à donner des règles certaines à notre langue et à la rendre pure, éloquente et capable de traiter les arts et les sciences. donner des règles / "giving rules" suggests rule-breaking or lawlessness or language without borders</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 21:22:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Who coined the term "Holocaust" to refer to the Nazi "final solution ...</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/106031/who-coined-the-term-holocaust-to-refer-to-the-nazi-final-solution-for-the-je</link><description>Before World War II the word "holocaust" referred most often to a huge inferno. Who first used the term to describe the Nazi murder of 6 million Jews? When and where?</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:33:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What is the proper contraction for “should not have”</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/497196/what-is-the-proper-contraction-for-should-not-have</link><description>The second apostrophe is generally left out for aesthetic reasons, but yes, that’s it. Or shouldna If you prefer. Whether it’s ‘proper English’ depends entirely on whose definition of what’s ‘proper’ you choose to adhere to. It’s perfectly proper if you go by my definition.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 23:39:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Where did "You know what thought did!" come from?</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/2635/where-did-you-know-what-thought-did-come-from</link><description>This from Never Play Leapfrog with a Unicorn - Page 93 is a typical citation from Google Books: “You know what thought did don'tcha? He shit himself and thought someone else did it,” she said, followed as always with the look of a learned philosopher. I don't know why all the obviously relevant scatological responses to this question have been deleted.</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:19:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>american english - "I second that motion" or "I second that notion ...</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/128944/i-second-that-motion-or-i-second-that-notion</link><description>The correct phrase is "second that motion". It originates from parliamentary procedure and is commonly used in meetings of all kinds of clubs and organizations. Wikipedia defines second thus: In deliberative bodies a second to a proposed motion is an indication that there is at least one person besides the mover that is interested in seeing the motion come before the meeting. and motion thus ...</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 01:51:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>If you are talking "on behalf of" you and someone else, what is the ...</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/10684/if-you-are-talking-on-behalf-of-you-and-someone-else-what-is-the-correct-usag</link><description>I looked at a bunch of style guides to see what they have to say on this subject. The vast majority of them dedicate at least a paragraph to the distinction (or nondistinction) between "in behalf of" and "on behalf of"—but not one addresses the question of how to handle "on behalf of" when used by a speaker to refer to another person and to him- or herself. This silence leads me to believe ...</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 05:25:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>