<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Bing: Functionality Questionnaire</title><link>http://www.bing.com:80/search?q=Functionality+Questionnaire</link><description>Search results</description><copyright>Copyright © 2026 Microsoft. All rights reserved. These XML results may not be used, reproduced or transmitted in any manner or for any purpose other than rendering Bing results within an RSS aggregator for your personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of these results requires express written permission from Microsoft Corporation. By accessing this web page or using these results in any manner whatsoever, you agree to be bound by the foregoing restrictions.</copyright><item><title>Functionality vs. Functionalities: are both correct and idiomatic?</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/196590/functionality-vs-functionalities-are-both-correct-and-idiomatic</link><description>Both functionality as well as functionalities can be used depending on context. They are both correct, grammatical and make sense in appropriate context.</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 04:45:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>"Functionalities" vs "features" - what's the difference?</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/43448/functionalities-vs-features-whats-the-difference</link><description>The functionality of a product usually means the extent of its overall ability: 2. The purpose that something is designed or expected to fulfill - manufacturing processes may be affected by the functionality of the product 3. The range of operations that can be run on a computer or other electronic system - new software with additional ...</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 13:30:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is it OK to say "functionality wise and productivity wise"</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/458643/is-it-ok-to-say-functionality-wise-and-productivity-wise</link><description>We tell a customer about recent changes in our software. Is it OK to say "These changes are very important functionality wise and productivity wise for you"?</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 20:48:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>word choice - "Functionality" rather than "function"? - English ...</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/253360/functionality-rather-than-function</link><description>Functionality does have a technical meaning in areas like computer technology, meaning a range of abilities. Fast forward is a singular function, so perhaps the cable provider could have chosen better usage, but the grammar is fine.</description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 18:01:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Any alternative to 'function' or 'functionality'? [closed]</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/621296/any-alternative-to-function-or-functionality</link><description>So, any terms other than 'function', 'functionality', or 'capability'. Edit: Example sentence- He opened the flood gates, letting the high pressure water streams move through the contraption activating it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:22:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is "functionality" a mass noun in certain contexts? When and why?</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/253507/is-functionality-a-mass-noun-in-certain-contexts-when-and-why</link><description>It then proceeds to use an example where the form is uncountable. So when would you use "functionalities"? In common usage I hear "functionality" as a mass noun all the time, but never the pluralization.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:16:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>word choice - Functionality is working "fine" or "as expected ...</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/305262/functionality-is-working-fine-or-as-expected</link><description>Here the functionality is related with web Site responses. Now I'm looking for a sentence which would be preferable when, ABC functionality was not working before, (Explanation of some work has</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 12:25:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What do you call a person that goes for functionality, yet not for the ...</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/494708/what-do-you-call-a-person-that-goes-for-functionality-yet-not-for-the-beauty-of</link><description>What do you call a person that goes for functionality, yet not for the beauty of set things? For example in a game, this person builds things that are well made and functioning, but lack on the creative and beautiful side.</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 01:17:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What is Visual Design? — updated 2025 | IxDF</title><link>https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/visual-design?param1=buyer-personas</link><description>Visual design aims to improve a design’s/product’s aesthetic appeal and usability with suitable images, typography, space, layout and color.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2025 17:48:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What is the word for things that work even when they aren't working (e ...</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/514454/what-is-the-word-for-things-that-work-even-when-they-arent-working-e-g-escala</link><description>Name 'stress' anything that could impair the integrity or functionality of the system. This having been said, for day-to-day objects I would prefer the word robust, somehow. I would say that a moped is robust against the lack of fuel, an electric toothbrush is so against the lack of power supply.</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:40:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>