<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Bing: Generic Process Activity</title><link>http://www.bing.com:80/search?q=Generic+Process+Activity</link><description>Search results</description><copyright>Copyright © 2026 Microsoft. All rights reserved. These XML results may not be used, reproduced or transmitted in any manner or for any purpose other than rendering Bing results within an RSS aggregator for your personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of these results requires express written permission from Microsoft Corporation. By accessing this web page or using these results in any manner whatsoever, you agree to be bound by the foregoing restrictions.</copyright><item><title>What's the difference between "general" and "generic"?</title><link>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/167224/whats-the-difference-between-general-and-generic</link><description>Generic is the opposite of specific. Generic and specific refer to the identification of a fact. Specific means a fact that has been specified. If you ask for (specify) a pain reliever, aspirin would be a specific pain reliever, while aspirin, acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and naproxen together would be generic pain relievers.</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 14:59:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>C# Generics and Type Checking - Stack Overflow</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/982952/c-sharp-generics-and-type-checking</link><description>In case you happen to have a generic method that returns a generic value but doesn't have generic parameters, you can use default(T) + (T)(object) cast, together with C# 8 pattern matching/type checks (as indicated in the other recent answers).</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 06:52:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How do you provide a default type for generics? - Stack Overflow</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1099440/how-do-you-provide-a-default-type-for-generics</link><description>The generic parameter type will be the same for all methods, so I would like it at the class level. I know I could make a generic version and then inherit from it for the int version, but I was just hoping to get it all in one... but I didn't know of any way to do that.</description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 06:19:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Creating a generic method in C# - Stack Overflow</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2144495/creating-a-generic-method-in-c-sharp</link><description>I am trying to combine a bunch of similar methods into a generic method. I have several methods that return the value of a querystring, or null if that querystring does not exist or is not in the</description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 16:20:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>c# - How to compare values of generic types? - Stack Overflow</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6480577/how-to-compare-values-of-generic-types</link><description>So, two questions: Why do we observe this weird behaviour? What keeps us from comparing the values of generic types which are known to be IComparable? Doesn't it somehow defeat the entire purpose of generic constraints? How do I resolve this, or at least work around it?</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 22:21:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How can I pass in a func with a generic type parameter?</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12578965/how-can-i-pass-in-a-func-with-a-generic-type-parameter</link><description>I like to send a generic type converter function to a method but I can't figure out how to do it. Here's invalid syntax that explains what I like to achieve, the problem is I don't know how to spe...</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:34:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How do I get the type name of a generic type argument?</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2581642/how-do-i-get-the-type-name-of-a-generic-type-argument</link><description>This extension method outputs the simple type name for non-generic types, and appends the list of generic arguments for generic types. This works fine for scenarios where you don't need to worry about inner generic arguments, like IDictionary&lt;int, IDictionary&lt;int, string&gt;&gt;.</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 03:05:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>void in C# generics? - Stack Overflow</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11318973/void-in-c-sharp-generics</link><description>In particular, we wouldn't need both the Func&lt;T&gt; and Action&lt;T&gt; families - there'd just be Func&lt;void&gt; instead of Action, Func&lt;T, void&gt; instead of Action&lt;T&gt; etc. It would also make async simpler - there'd be no need for the non-generic Task type at all - we'd just have Task&lt;void&gt;. Unfortunately, that's not the way the C# or .NET type systems work...</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:41:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Can I make a generic optional, defaulting to a certain class?</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13717802/can-i-make-a-generic-optional-defaulting-to-a-certain-class</link><description>My question is related to Is there a reasonable approach to &amp;quot;default&amp;quot; type parameters in C# Generics?, but using an inner generic class that approach doesn't work. Given code like this: ...</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 17:44:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Using a 'using alias = class' with generic types? [duplicate]</title><link>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4936941/using-a-using-alias-class-with-generic-types</link><description>using LookupDictionary = System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary&lt;string, int&gt;; Now I want to accomplish the same with a generic type, while preserving it as a generic type:</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 18:14:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>