<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Bing: Logarithm Axis Python</title><link>http://www.bing.com:80/search?q=Logarithm+Axis+Python</link><description>Search results</description><copyright>Copyright © 2026 Microsoft. All rights reserved. These XML results may not be used, reproduced or transmitted in any manner or for any purpose other than rendering Bing results within an RSS aggregator for your personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of these results requires express written permission from Microsoft Corporation. By accessing this web page or using these results in any manner whatsoever, you agree to be bound by the foregoing restrictions.</copyright><item><title>notation - The logarithm is non-linear! Or isn't it? - Mathematics ...</title><link>https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1398150/the-logarithm-is-non-linear-or-isnt-it</link><description>The logarithm is an isomorphism between the vector space of positive-real numbers to the vector space of real numbers. And as every isomorphism is a linear function, so is the logarithm.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 05:10:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Natural log of a negative number - Mathematics Stack Exchange</title><link>https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3980247/natural-log-of-a-negative-number</link><description>My teacher told me that the natural logarithm of a negative number does not exist, but $$\ln (-1)=\ln (e^ {i\pi})=i\pi$$ So, is it logical to have the natural logarithm of a negative number?</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why must the base of a logarithm be a positive real number not equal to ...</title><link>https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/690024/why-must-the-base-of-a-logarithm-be-a-positive-real-number-not-equal-to-1</link><description>Why must the base of a logarithm be a positive real number not equal to 1? Ask Question Asked 12 years, 1 month ago Modified 6 years, 5 months ago</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:07:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>algebra precalculus - Inequality sign change with logarithm ...</title><link>https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3860116/inequality-sign-change-with-logarithm</link><description>Why does the inequality sign change when applying a logarithm on both sides, with the base less than $1$? I came across the following math which I solved if 2 ways, $$ \left (\frac {1} {2}\right)^n &amp;...</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 16:07:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why does raising the logarithm of a number by its base equal the number ...</title><link>https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4281665/why-does-raising-the-logarithm-of-a-number-by-its-base-equal-the-number</link><description>I found the following rule while reviewing logarithms: "Raising the logarithm of a number by its base equals the number.", i.e., $$ b^ {\log_b (k)} =k.$$ Why is this true?</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 06:25:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why is it called "antilog" or "anti-logarithm" rather than ...</title><link>https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3785751/why-is-it-called-antilog-or-anti-logarithm-rather-than-exponentiation</link><description>Until we make the generalization of exponents to arbitrary powers, there is no hope of describing the inverse logarithm as an exponential function. One "convenience" of the antilog notation is that the following equation $$ \log \antilog x = x = \antilog \log x $$ is true both for Napier's "sines" and subsequent inverse exponential logarithms.</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 10:12:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What is discrete logarithm? - Mathematics Stack Exchange</title><link>https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3746348/what-is-discrete-logarithm</link><description>The discrete Logarithm is just reversing this question, just like we did with real numbers - but this time, with objects that aren't necessarily numbers. For example, if $ {a\cdot a = a^2 = b}$, then we can say for example $ {\log_ {a} (b)=2}$.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 22:34:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What is the point of logarithms? How are they used?</title><link>https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/16342/what-is-the-point-of-logarithms-how-are-they-used</link><description>Logarithms are defined as the solutions to exponential equations and so are practically useful in any situation where one needs to solve such equations (such as finding how long it will take for a population to double or for a bank balance to reach a given value with compound interest). Historically, they were also useful because of the fact that the logarithm of a product is the sum of the ...</description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 21:57:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What algorithm is used by computers to calculate logarithms?</title><link>https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/61209/what-algorithm-is-used-by-computers-to-calculate-logarithms</link><description>I would like to know how logarithms are calculated by computers. The GNU C library, for example, uses a call to the fyl2x() assembler instruction, which means that logarithms are calculated directl...</description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 19:40:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The difference between log and ln - Mathematics Stack Exchange</title><link>https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/90594/the-difference-between-log-and-ln</link><description>Beware that $\log$ does not unambiguously mean the base-10 logarithm, but rather "the logarithm that we usually use". In many areas of higher mathematics, $\log$ means the natural logarithm and the $\ln$ notation is seldom seen. And computer scientists routinely use $\log$ to mean $\log_2$.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>