<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Bing: Source Code Logo Transparent Background</title><link>http://www.bing.com:80/search?q=Source+Code+Logo+Transparent+Background</link><description>Search results</description><copyright>Copyright © 2026 Microsoft. All rights reserved. These XML results may not be used, reproduced or transmitted in any manner or for any purpose other than rendering Bing results within an RSS aggregator for your personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of these results requires express written permission from Microsoft Corporation. By accessing this web page or using these results in any manner whatsoever, you agree to be bound by the foregoing restrictions.</copyright><item><title>What is the difference between "." "./" and "source"?</title><link>https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/312573/what-is-the-difference-between-and-source</link><description>The above executes the script. When the script is done, any changes that it made to the environment are discarded. . script The above sources the script. It is as if the commands had been typed in directly. Any environment changes are kept. source script This also sources the script. The source command is not required by POSIX and therefore is less portable than the shorter ..</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 02:55:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Source vs . why different behaviour? - Unix &amp; Linux Stack Exchange</title><link>https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/309768/source-vs-why-different-behaviour</link><description>source is a shell keyword that is supposed to be used like this: source file where file contains valid shell commands. These shell commands will be executed in the current shell as if typed from the command line.</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 02:30:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>bash script error: source: not found - Unix &amp; Linux Stack Exchange</title><link>https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/116584/bash-script-error-source-not-found</link><description>You have an alias which is overriding the builtin source (fix with unalias source) You have a function which is overriding source (fix with unset -f source) You are somehow not using bash (although your bang line would suggest you are). source is not POSIX. Using source on dash does not work, only . works.</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 04:22:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What is the difference between building from source and using an ...</title><link>https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/152346/what-is-the-difference-between-building-from-source-and-using-an-install-package</link><description>I.e., unpack the source package from your distribution, replace the source with the upstream version, check if any of the distribution's patches or configuration tweaks still apply, build the binary package (make sure you changed the version of the packaged stuff!) and install that one. Yes, it is more work than just building and installing.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 17:24:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Where to download Linux Kernel source code of a specific version ...</title><link>https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/46077/where-to-download-linux-kernel-source-code-of-a-specific-version</link><description>Is there a resource to download a specific kernel version source? For example, I want to get 2.6.36.2 sources to compare with this package and see what changes were introduced?</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 09:53:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Conflicting values set for option Signed-By regarding source</title><link>https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/732030/conflicting-values-set-for-option-signed-by-regarding-source</link><description>Conflicting values set for option Signed-By regarding source Ask Question Asked 3 years, 3 months ago Modified 14 days ago</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 07:19:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Open new terminal with environment specified by source command</title><link>https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/719506/open-new-terminal-with-environment-specified-by-source-command</link><description>The terminal closes again as soon as the source cmd has finished executing. Though you can't be blamed for thinking that would surely work: putting the source cmd in a script and running that using the terminal with the --command flag, so that the --hold flag might also be used to stop the terminal exiting when the source command has finished ...</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:39:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Where should I put my source code? - Unix &amp; Linux Stack Exchange</title><link>https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/464407/where-should-i-put-my-source-code</link><description>Source code may be placed in this subdirectory, only for reference purposes. with a footnote adding that Generally, source should not be built within this hierarchy. It’s your system though so in my opinion /usr/local/src is fair game. What is the "/usr/local/src" folder meant for? has more on the topic; read this answer in particular.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 02:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How to "source" a specific variable - Unix &amp; Linux Stack Exchange</title><link>https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/580575/how-to-source-a-specific-variable</link><description>Also ${BASH_SOURCE} will give the user a hint to the location of the file. The second line # -*-mode:sh;sh-shell:bash;fill-column:84-*- is for Emacs to figure out how to highlight and indent the file when I edit it. The two functions provided by guest are great, but if put in separate files will not be active if you just run the files.</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 01:39:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Now that apt-key is deprecated, how do you add an Ubuntu PPA as a ...</title><link>https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/679495/now-that-apt-key-is-deprecated-how-do-you-add-an-ubuntu-ppa-as-a-debian-apt-sou</link><description>Background In the past, if you wanted to install software from an Ubuntu PPA in Debian, the approach was to import/trust the developer's GPG key from keyserver.ubuntu.com, $ sudo apt-key adv --rec...</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:22:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>