While <strong> and <em> are of course more semantically correct, there seem definite legitimate reasons to use the <b> and <i> tags for customer-written content.

Dec 20, 2009 · Both of them emphasize text. The &lt;em&gt; tag shows text as italics, whereas &lt;strong&gt; makes it bold. Is this the only difference?

Mar 4, 2009 · I heard you should define sizes and distances in your stylesheet with em instead of in pixels. So the question is why should I use em instead of px when defining styles in CSS? Is there a …

Jul 31, 2011 · The 'em' is a very useful unit in CSS, since it can adapt automatically to the font that the reader uses An EM is relative to the current element it is defined on. If you use relative sizes (like …

em has the purpose of giving em phasis to the content. In practice emphasised content is typically displayed italicised, so the difference on the face of it is non-existing from a presentation standpoint. …

Apr 5, 2013 · The name of em is related to M. Originally the unit was derived from the width of the capital "M" in the given typeface. My interpretation of the first sentence would be that 'em' is the …

Jun 17, 2015 · cite & em is HTML 5 - standard, which insists in meaning. For a long time, old HTML (like <i>) is used for layout display. But the new standard requires that HTML should only consists of …

Dec 17, 2010 · The M-principle that an em is based on the letter M and is dependent on font is an often stated myth!! very succinctly describes exactly how ems and pixels relate. Using the letter M to …

Jun 12, 2017 · strong y em, en cambio, marcan una diferencia en la fuerza o énfasis que se quiere dar a una palabra o frase sobre el texto completo. En un navegador tradicional la diferencia no se percibe, …

Sep 25, 2008 · When setting the size of fonts in CSS, should I be using a percent value (%) or em? Can you explain the advantage?